{"id":4086,"date":"2017-05-29T10:31:05","date_gmt":"2017-05-29T17:31:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thomasjayoord.com\/index.php\/blog\/archives\/"},"modified":"2020-04-16T04:49:59","modified_gmt":"2020-04-16T11:49:59","slug":"9-reasons-believe-humans-genuine-limited-freedom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thomasjayoord.com\/index.php\/blog\/archives\/9-reasons-believe-humans-genuine-limited-freedom","title":{"rendered":"9 Reasons We Have Genuine but Limited Freedom"},"content":{"rendered":"

An essay I wrote has just been published. I argue humans and God have genuine but limited freedom.\u00a0 The new book is What’s with Free Will? Ethics and Religion after Neuroscience<\/em>, edited by James Walters and Philip Clayton.<\/p>\n

The book responds to some neuroscientists who claim human free will is an illusion. These neuroscientists base their views on a few experiments. For many reasons, I believe they are wrong in thinking this. The experiments don’t come close to disproving human freedom. \"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Here is a portion of my book chapter. I offer nine reasons why we should believe humans have genuine but limited freedom:<\/p>\n

We should affirm human freedom because\u2026<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    belief in freedom fits the data we know best: that we are freely choosing selves. We all presuppose in our actions that we make free choices and we know this from our first-person perspectives. We have better grounds to think human freedom is genuine than think it is not.<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n
  2. \n

    it helps us make sense of other creatures, especially humans. This argument fits nicely with what philosophers call \u201cthe analogy of other minds.\u201d I think of it often when I consider how parents raise children. Nearly all parents believe their kids have some degree of freedom, at least sometimes, and they reward or discipline their children accordingly.<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n
  3. \n

    belief in freedom seems necessary to affirm human moral responsibility. This is an obvious reason why we should believe humans are free. Without freedom, humans seem neither praiseworthy nor blameworthy. Moral responsibility requires free response-ability.<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n
  4. \n

    it\u2019s a component of love. When it comes to humans, it\u2019s difficult to think we can make sense of love if we think humans are not free in any sense. Robots may do good things, but unless we define love in an odd way, we don\u2019t think robots can love. Love requires genuine but limited freedom.<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n
  5. \n

    belief in freedom seems necessary to affirm that we sometimes intentionally learn new information. Insofar as students choose to be educated, this choice presupposes free will. Insofar as we all seek to learn, we act freely.<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n
  6. \n

    it accounts for intentional actions to reject the old and welcome the new or reject the new and return to the old. Conservatives appeal to freedom when calling us to return to past ideas, and progressives appeal to freedom when calling us to embrace new ones. Intentional change presupposes free will.<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n
  7. \n

    belief in freedom is part of what motivates many people to choose good over evil. Those who believe their negative urges are beyond their control typically fail to resist those negative urges. And those who encounter evil are unlikely to resist it if they feel nothing can be done. After all, why try to combat antisocial behavior if we\u2019re not free?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n
  8. \n

    it is necessary for believing our lives matter. If all life is predetermined, it makes no sense to think our lives have meaning or that what we do ultimately matters. If all comes down to fate, we make no real contribution to what has already been decided.<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n
  9. \n

    belief in freedom is most compatible with believing God loves us. This is not only true if one believes a loving God would give freedom to creatures. It\u2019s also true for rejecting the view that God praises or punishes creatures who are not free. A fully predestining God has no grounds to judge predetermined creatures.<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The final reason I list for why we should believe humans have genuine but limited freedom r\"\"efers to God. In the second half of my essay, I explore what God\u2019s freedom might be like. But I believe descriptions of divine freedom will be inadequate if we don\u2019t also explore the relationship between God\u2019s love and power, creaturely freedom, and evil in the world. So I explore those ideas as well.<\/p>\n

    I hope you consider getting a copy of this new book. When you read my full essay, let me know what you think of my arguments.<\/p>\n

    In the meantime, below is a short video with these 9 reasons…<\/p>\n