Why You Actually Believe God Must Love Us (even though you may say otherwise)

February 8th, 2018 / 2 Comments

Many Christians think God voluntarily chooses to love and relate with us, even though God could choose not to do so. I disagree. In this essay, I ask three diagnostic questions I think show that most Christians actually believe God must love and relate with us, even though they may say otherwise.

In a series of previous essays, I’ve laid out reasons why we should think God is relational (or passible). I’ve distinguished between saying God is voluntarily relational and essentially relational. In the most recent essay, I’ve showed several reasons why it matters to affirm that God essentially relates to and essentially loves us.

In this essay, I hope to show those who think God’s love for and relation to creation is entirely voluntary actually think God’s relations and love are essential.

Three Diagnostic Questions

I offer three questions to show that most Christians really think God essentially loves and relates with creation. I ask you, the reader, to answer the following three questions honestly. Answer in your head before reading my responses.

1. Do you think God could ever leave us, forsake us, or stop loving us?

Most people answer “yes.” They think it’s possible for God to choose to be unrelated, unaffected, and uninfluenced. In their view, God could choose to leave us and forsake us. God could choose to stop loving us. “God sovereignly chooses to love the world,” they might say.

This is the voluntary relations or weak passibility view, and it’s probably the stated (but not actual) view of most Christians I know.

Let’s move to the second question…

2. Do you think God would ever leave us, forsake us, or stop loving us?

Most people answer “no.” They think God will always relate with us, always be present to us, always love, and always support us. In their view, we can trust God in these crucial ways.

But those who think God could stop loving us have no good reasons to think God would not stop loving. Those who think God could leave us and forsake us have no good reasons to think God would never choose to leave us or forsake us. There is no justification for such views.

Let me put it another way, if God’s eternal nature does not include love for creation, we have no good reason to think God will always be with us and never forsake us. And if God’s eternal nature does not include love for creation, there’s no good reason to think God will continue loving us in give-and-receive relationship.

And that leads to the third question…

3. Why do you think God would never leave us, never forsake us, or never stop loving us?

Most people answer this question, “that’s just who God is.” They say, “If God left us, forsook us, or stopped loving us, God wouldn’t be acting like God.” Or they offer a variation of these answers. When answering this third, “why” question, most people appeal to their deep belief about who God truly is.

This deeper belief shows that people really do think God is essentially relational. Although they may not articulate it well, most think God’s love for us is an essential aspect of what it means to be God. Saying “that’s just who God is” is really saying, “It’s God’s nature to be like that.” God can’t help but love us, because that’s God’s nature.

Those who believe God by nature loves creation affirm strong divine passiblity, even if they can’t articulate this belief well. They actually believe God essentially relates with and loves creation.

Those who believe God by nature loves creation affirm that God is essentially relational, even if they can’t articulate this belief. A God whose nature includes the attribute of love for creatures MUST love us! Click To Tweet
Add comment

Comments

Colin Barnes

Hey Tom,

I agree that God has to love, but I think he does so voluntarily… if that is not an oxymoron. Love is the supreme place of maturity for any personal being to get to. We see that clearly here on earth when we honour and celebrate those who live truly altruistic lives. Whether God has always been convinced of that, or became convinced, is a philosophical black hole. Suffice to say he celebrates his steadfast love. When Moses asks him to show him his glory (Ex 33:18), God responds by saying he will show him his ‘goodness’ and goes on to describe his goodness in Ex 34:6-7. If someone’s glory is the thing we celebrate about them, then God is celebrating his choice to always love the other. I suspect that when we attain maturity, we too, will have no choice but to love. We will have gotten there through many choices, trials and revelations. Even if God has always been love, he only ‘has to love’ because he understands that fully. Could it be that it is as if he’s already had those experiences, trials and revelations? That is, he has the same freedom we will have when we mature?

Love your stuff.


thomasjayoord

Thanks, Colin. Have you read Paul Fiddes’s book, The Creative Suffering of God? Your view and his are similar.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Type in all 5 of the digits below to leave a comment. * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.