I chose my blog title to acknowledge that a growing number of Evangelicals accept evolution as compatible with Christianity. I also chose my title to argue that Evangelicals should accept evolution as compatible with faith.

Jesus’ brain must have made a difference in who he was and how he loved. Recent neuroscience offers research and theories that prompt us to think anew about Jesus of Nazareth.

Exemplars are unique and they don’t become exemplars overnight. They are proof of the old saying, practice makes perfect.

Love is primary for any adequate ethic. But can the human brain – especially the brains of those who love often and well – tell us anything about love?

A vegetarian butcher. That’s the combination some people think analogous to being both a scientist and theologian.

I spend a great deal of time engaging fundamentalists. And I’ve learned a few lessons over the years.

I previously identified some problems inherent in creatio ex nihilo. I believe a new doctrine of creation, God’s creating out of creation with a nature of love (creatio ex creation a natura amoris), is more adequate for Christians.

I believe God created the heavens, the earth, and every living thing. But I think Christians should reject the idea that God created the universe from absolutely nothing.

In my past two installments, I noted five things I like about Intelligent Design and five things I don’t. I conclude with my final (and apparently unique) criticism of ID.

Having pointed out five things I like about Intelligent Design, I turn now to five things I don’t like.